手机浏览器扫描二维码访问
[129]cfthebibliographytoch35
[130]este,forschunnundfortschritte1930,p182f,ataedthatthetitlebyzantiufirstcatoewithi插eliasaresultofregnizg插rlesthegreat&rso;sassuptionofthebaretitleofbasilethist,however,beodifiedthelightoftheexaplesofearlieraofwhichwenowhaveknowledcfespeciallytheiperialsealpubli射dbynli插cev,&lso;sceauxdel&rso;epereurléon3l&rso;isaurien&rso;,b11(1936),469ff(withtheadditionalnotebyhgrégoire,ib482)andvlaurent,&lso;notedetitulaturebyzante&rso;,eo38(1939),355ff(ide,l&rso;histoired&rso;untitreetletéoignadelanuisatie;,cronicanuisatiasiarcheologica15,1940,198ff,isaessibleto)allthesa,itreastruethatbefore812thetitleofbasileseldoappearedwiththeaddition,andafter812seldoappearedwithoutthis,thatthesipledesignationofbasilewasgraduallysupersededbythetitlethiswasnotareaident,anddolr(bz37(1937)579)rightlyassertsthatthebyzantes&lso;dentitelderforarauchvor812lentlichbrauchthaben,dasssieihnjedochitgrossererkonseenzunddeonstrativerbewstheiterstnach812starkerbetontundbiszuendedesreichesbeibehaltenhaben&rso;cfaldolr,bz36(1936),132f,andespecially40(1940),518f,al&lso;roderdankenweltderbyzanter&rso;,zeitschrfkirchensch56(1937),7ff(reprteddolr,byzanz)。
[131]peschra,kaiser,roundrenovatio1(1929),12ffand83f
[132]dukuanddicevgwhobothonlyreignedforashortti;cfbesevliev,godisniknafijskijauniv(yearbookoftheuniversityoffia),32,9,p1ff
[133]cfruncian,bulgarianepire72f
[134]ostrogorsky,bilderstreit,p51,fragnt17,。
[135]theactaoftheuncilof754atteptedtoestablishtheinoclastpotofviewbyadetaileddiscsiononachristologicalbasis;theinodulesthroughoutthentroversy,butespeciallydurgthelatterperiod,alephasizedtheextenttowhichtheteachgaboutinswasboundupwithchristologicaldoctrethewholeprobleissudupbyasglesentenceofthesynodof815whentheinodulesarereproachedbecaethey(ostrogorsky,bilderstreit,p50,fragnt14)onlythosesufficientlyfailiarwiththeactaof754willappreciatethesignificanceofthissentenceupholdgtheprovocativeandniothesisthenexpoundedbywhichtheinoduleswereaedoffallgtotheheresieseitherofonophysisorofnestorianis
[136]itatathisview,spiteofthedifferentopionofpjalexander&lso;theinoclastuncilofstphiaanditsdefition&rso;,dubartonoakspapers7(1953),35ff,andalltheorescethenceptionswhichheputsforwardasrepresentgthenewteachgofthesynodof815arenottheirownideasbutonlyacitationfrobasilthegreat,thatitisclearthattheviewswhichalexanderwouldliketoattributetothenth-centuryinoclastsarereallytakenfrobasil
[137]ansi14,417ff
[138]vasiliev,byzanceetlesarabes1,22ff,itisataedthatthoaswasanarnianthisisnot,however,vasiliev&rso;sownview(theorigaltextheopenlydeclaresfortheslavorigofthoas,cfvizantijaiaraby1,24,andseealhistory275,n131),butitistheopionoftheeditorsofthefrenchtranslationwhorevisedvasiliev&rso;sworkitisnotiteclearwhytheeditorsdecidefirlyandunreservedlyfavourofthearnianreadgtheontradictorypassasnesi(p8andp32,wherethoasisdescribedasbegofarnianandscythianancestryrespectively),anddisregardtheclearstatentoftheophanesnt,p50,ontheslavancestryofthoasvasiliev,andbeforehibury,&lso;theidentityofthoastheslavonian&rso;,bz1(1892),55ff(cfaleasternroepire85etpassi),thoughtthatitwaspossibletoregardthoasasaslavfroasiaorontheevidenceoftherationtheophanesntwhichagreeswiththatofnesi,p32ostscholarsnowsupportthisviewcfrajkovic,&lso;oporekto,vodjetanka821-3g&rso;,zbornikradovavizst2(1953),33ff(frenchrésué),whichyviewhasfallydecidedtheestionseetheiportantexaationoftheurcesbyfbarisc,&rso;dveverzijeuizvoriaotanikutoi&rso;(oversionsoftheurcesfortherevoltofthoas),zrvi6(1959)145ffelipsic,&lso;vosstaniefoyslavjanaivizantijskoekrestjanstvonagrani8-9vv&rso;(therisgofthoastheslavandthebyzantepeasantryattheturnoftheeighthandnthcenturies),vestnikdrevnejistorii1939nr1,andocerki,212ff,providesauchfullerdescriptionofthisrevolt
[139]theophanesnt53
[140]vasiliev,byzanceetlesarabes1,49ffitisnotpossibletodeteretheprecisedatewhencretewascapturedstatentstherelevantliteraturevaryandputitbeeen823and828;thevestigationofjpapadopulos,(824-961),(texteundforschunnzurbyz-neugrphilol43),athens1948,58ff,doesnotseetotohaveyieldedanyoredefiteresultthelateststudyofthehistoryofthearabrulecrete,ntoadakes,(826-961)&rso;,eebs30(1960),1ff,doesnotdiscstheestionoftheyearwhichitwascaptured
[141]deadip,c29,60(edoravcsik-jenks)。
[142]cfchdiehl,&lso;laléndedel&rso;epereurthéophile&rso;,sekond4(1931),33ff
现代皇室题材,将完新文二胎计划,霸道总统宠宠宠一次酒醉,她和一个男人发生了不该的事。隔天,两个男人同时要对她负责?可是和她发生关系的是二殿下,为什么胁迫她领证的却是三殿下?三殿下,你为什么对我纠缠不休?某女不解。因为我想睡你。他坦然回答,面不改色。那你为什么要和我结婚?她眉头微拧。因为要名正言顺地睡你。他面不红耳不赤。那,你为什么不让我怀孕!她攥紧拳头,秀眉紧蹙。因为,我忍不了十个月不碰你。他邪肆一笑,揽她入怀。五年前,他们身份悬殊,他是一国王子,她是普通平民,他们注定离婚收场。当别人嘲笑她嫁了个瘸子时,她莞尔一笑,我男人材大器粗,我过的很性福!当他们离婚时,他捏着她的下巴逼问,我是不是真正的男人,难道你感受不大?感受不深?五年后,他们再次重逢。她睡了他,丢了131块4毛。隔天,他带着钱来对她死缠烂打,既然你要跟我一生一世,咱们复婚吧?她嫣然一笑,好啊,但这次是你嫁给我!嫁!他干脆利落回答。没想到当晚,他便把她压在身上,老婆,咱们要个孩子吧!他睡她,总是有理有据,花样百出!孩子冠她之姓,登记户口...
一朝起床,她被告知强了男神,此神还是帝都最富有的倾国倾城少爷,从此被人追债,她无处可逃。本就是寄人篱下的小女佣,被人抢了男朋友不算,还被姐夫觊觎惦记,处处受欺侮,现在又多了个霸道男神百般掠夺,当她好欺负?她可不是任人搓圆捏扁的软柿子,为了自己和姐姐的幸福,她周旋在豪门之间,斗智斗勇,简直是翻了天。有人跑到男神前告状这女人要不得,快把她逐出豪门。男神淡淡地勾起薄唇这不顺了她的心?她誓不嫁豪门,他偏要圈住她,把她宠上了天,做他的甜宝宝...
穿越之后的第十六年,罗南终于越狱成功了!这是一个狂躁的世界。钢铁与巫术在碰撞,信仰与自由面临抉择。能改变世界的只有两种人,天才或者疯子。罗南从来都不觉得自己是天才。然而却在不经意间谱写了星河与魔幻的时代最瑰丽的传说。继暗夜游侠之后,深蓝椰子汁新书。一如既往的快节奏剧情流全新的设定,更加突出的画面感描写!请放心收藏,点击,推荐!...
她是夏氏集团大小姐,也是当红小花旦,拥清纯女神之称,一场有预谋的陷害,不禁失了清白,被亲生父亲赶出家门,更是成了人人喊打的过街老鼠。走头无路之际,被某个毒舌傲娇又高冷的男人拣回了家,那个传说中有厌女症,所有雌性不得靠近三米之内的异类。可是,谁能告诉她,眼前这个逼她签下不平等契约,时时刻刻威逼利诱恨不能把她拴在身边的男人到底是个什么鬼,说好的高冷呢?说...
神仙之说,由来已久。只是鸿蒙不记年,所谓盘古开天女娲造人之说不知距今几时,皆不可考。正史中自上古黄帝始,便有广成子布道,容成公成仙之说。史料中所载黄帝蚩...
「正文已经完结—番外更新中」夫君,别亲了,节制点。对你,我无法自控。她,将军府不受宠三小姐,被迫嫁给了二皇子。新婚之夜直接被送入洞房,连新郎的面都没有见到,府中怪事重重,下人竟是纸人所变。就连死去的二皇子也出现在她的面前,不仅调戏她,还说要给她生猴子。所有人都想至她于死地,幸得二皇子独宠她,二皇子为她痴,为她狂,为她哐哐虐渣渣,像是开挂版宠她上天入地。他是已经病逝的二皇子,容貌妖孽无双,更是那高高在上神秘的鬼帝。传言中的他狠毒冷漠,却唯独对她溺宠,成为了宠妃狂魔。(他邪魅冷漠,她聪明伶俐,1v1独宠。)...